All Questions  /
June 2, 2022
1
Should the WHO continue making decisions about our health?
Should the WHO be given more power over personal health and national sovereignty?
A
32 answers
...
1 comment
A
Answered by therealrestoreinc
Jun. 3, 2022, 2:33 a.m.
No. People who do not know how or cannot understand how bodies get well still have rights to their own bodies. Endowed with early treatments, better nutrition and education about how nature provided an immune system that works -- the people of the world can share many medicinal strategies with each other. Unity of the world is not the goal of a patient who discovers successful medicine; it is obvious that a single medical management system is not a "first do no harm" approach, it is a convenience for rulers and a disaster for the billions of humans.
 15 
...
 
0 comments
A
Answered by rossjohnson
Jun. 11, 2022, 2:41 a.m.
No. In fact the WHO should be disbanded…. which won’t happen. So a parallel independent organization needs to take its place by earning the trust of the masses. And please no more billionaire pseudo-medical authorities such as Gates. There are some rays of sunshine on the horizon but it will take a long time with the masses having to WAKE UP to what is really going on.
 14 
...
 
2 comments
A
Answered by revelationsr
Jun. 18, 2022, 9:12 a.m.
As an obvious political arm of the Chinese Communist Party, the WHO lost all credibility during the pandemic.
 12 
...
 
1 comment
A
Answered by wellfleetian
Jun. 22, 2022, 5:28 p.m.
NO. To even attempt such a top-down approach to the humans of the world is testament to the idiocy of the proposal. This attempt is tied to corporate interests, governmental hierarchies and the Pharm cartels. Not human beings.
 10 
...
 
0 comments
A
Answered by quattroed
Jun. 17, 2022, 3:04 p.m.
who? who is WHO is the question?, we are not they, are they for we?. TRUST in we, not who
 9 
...
 
0 comments
A
Answered by thessa
Jun. 23, 2022, 6:30 a.m.
Absolutely not! This will be so open to an abuse of power over sovereign governments by those who are already wielding undue influence over WHO to further the WEF agenda.
 9 
...
 
0 comments
A
Answered by akwells2
Jul. 13, 2022, 5:11 p.m.
Simple answer. NO. They are completely untrustworthy and there is already enough evidence out there to show they are a criminal organisation with a terrorist at their helm, paid for by a private terrorist.
 8 
...
 
1 comment
A
Answered by bobcat118
Aug. 16, 2022, 12:26 p.m.
God no! After all the harm and death they've caused? Guidelines are ok. But forced vaccines? They're robbing is of the freedom to live our lives in peace. So many wanted and rolled up their sleeves quickly to get these jabs. Good for them! Others that weren't eager to do so should've been left alone. The mandates crossed the line big time
 7 
...
 
0 comments
A
Answered by akwells2
Aug. 29, 2022, 9:50 a.m.
It is so clear this is an untrustworthy organisation, influenced by outside sources. How dare these people presume to tell us what we can and can't do with our bodies.
 4 
...
 
0 comments
A
Answered by tomk
Jun. 14, 2022, 8:26 a.m.
Shabnam: you are trolling us.
 3 
...
 
0 comments
TrialSiteNews
159 W Broadway, Suite 200
Salt Lake City, UT 84101
© 2024 - Trial Site News